Adverse Selection in Secondary Insurance Markets: Evidence from the Life Settlement Market
نویسندگان
چکیده
We use data from a large US life expectancy provider to test for asymmetric information in the secondary life insurance—or life settlement—market. We compare the average difference between realized lifetimes and estimated life expectancies for a sub-sample of settled policies relative to the entire sample. We find a significant positive difference indicating private information on mortality prospects. Using non-parametric estimates for the excess mortality and survival regressions, we show that the informational advantage is temporary and wears off over five to six years. We argue this is in line with adverse selection on an individual’s condition, which has important economic consequences for the life settlement market and beyond. JEL classification: D12; G22; J10
منابع مشابه
Life Insurance and Life Settlement Markets with Overconfident Policyholders
We analyze how the life settlement market – the secondary market for life insurance – may affect consumer welfare in a dynamic equilibrium model of life insurance with one-sided commitment and overconfident policyholders. As in Daily et al. (2008) and Fang and Kung (2010), policyholders may lapse their life insurance policies when they lose their bequest motives; but in our model the policyhold...
متن کاملMinimum standards, insurance regulation and adverse selection: evidence from the Medigap market
This paper examines the implications of minimum standards for insurance markets. I study the imposition of binding minimum standards on the market for voluntary private health insurance for the elderly. The central estimates suggest that the introduction of the standards was associated with an 8 percentage point (25%) decrease in the proportion of the population with coverage in the affected ma...
متن کاملPreference Heterogeneity and Insurance Markets: Explaining a Puzzle of Insurance.
The textbook approach to insurance markets emphasizes the role of private information about risk in determining who purchases insurance. In the classic adverse selection model of Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz (1976), individuals with higher expected claims buy more insurance than those with lower expected claims, who may be out of the market entirely. This basic prediction of asymmetri...
متن کاملInsurer Pricing and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from Medigap∗
While adverse selection is often blamed for ineffi ciently high insurance premiums, imperfect competition is also a pervasive feature of many health insurance markets. In Medicare Supplement insurance (Medigap), two firms control nearly three-fourths of the market and premiums exceed claims by thirty percent. I find that while adverse selection can restrain markups, a low price elasticity and c...
متن کاملIdentifying Information Asymmetries in Insurance: Experimental Evidence on Crop Insurance from the Philippines
Why have insurance markets for many important risks failed to develop? Economic theory suggests this is most likely due to asymmetric information problems, but their presence is hard to identify empirically. In this paper I provide empirical estimates of information asymmetries in the insurance for crops, a market that has failed to develop for the most important types of natural hazards to cro...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014